In Communism, the people organised in their work-place brigades and plenaries, neighbourhood assemblies and village/town/urban district assemblies constantly check product materials for their health and environmental effects. If there are any concerns, any citizen older than 16 may urge a local, regional, continental or global referendum on the permissibility of any material or product.
ORGANIC GROWTH
DANGERS OF NAVAL SWABS
WHAT ARE FLYING SAUCERS MADE OFF
MCP AND OTHER ALERTS: ONLY YOUR HOMEGROWN FOOD IS SAFE
https://www.bitchute.com/video/g5zDhnNkUX2E
12 REASONS VACCINES ARE DANGEROUS
TOXIC COATING ON YOUR VEGETABLES
PETER GAR SAYS POTENTIALLY HARMFUL VACCINES FOR COWS, PIGS, SHEEP AND OTHER CATTLE
UNWANTED EFFECTS OF SYNTHETIC PESTICIDES
https://www.livescience.com/10957-pesticide-turns-male-frogs-females.html
VACCINATED? AGAINST WHAT?
“Cricket Flour: yummy!“
Capitalists must be wondering: How can we dupe people into thinking that mass farming of crickets is somehow more ecological and morally acceptable than cow abuse?
Dandelions are good for your heart but Big Pharma and Big Agrochemical Industry are the same
https://newtube.app/user/RenaudBe/5EdkewY
Misnomer of the Year
Is the difference between bio and non-bio really bio?
from: http://www.biggreensmile.com
Biological washing powder and liquids contain enzymes. These help to break down fat, grease and proteins to get clothes clean. While enzymes are great for getting rid of stains, they can damage wool, silk and other materials. Many people also find that they aggravate eczema and other sensitive skin conditions. Non-bio doesn’t contain enzymes so is generally gentler, making it a better choice for sensitive skin. And, in our opinion, natural brands are even gentler as they don’t use harsh chemicals.
So, if anyone in your family suffers from eczema, psoriasis or other sensitive skin complaints, you may want to switch to a natural, non-bio detergent.
Does non-bio work as well as biological washing powder?
These days, non-bio detergents are very effective and will get most marks out. That being said, you might sometimes need an extra stain remover to treat really stubborn marks.
Is non-bio better for the environment?
Not necessarily, as many non-bios still contain non-biodegradable surfactants, phosphates and other chemicals that aren’t exactly eco-friendly.
Vaccine or just jab?
The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine contains:
- Active Ingredient
- nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (modRNA) encoding the viral spike glycoprotein (S) of SARS-CoV-2
- Lipids
- (4-hydroxybutyl)azanediyl)bis(hexane-6,1-diyl)bis (ALC-3015)
- (2- hexyldecanoate),2-[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,N-ditetradecylacetamide (ALC-0159)
- 1,2-distearoyl-snglycero-3-phosphocholine (DPSC)
- cholesterol
- Salts
- potassium chloride
- monobasic potassium phosphate
- sodium chloride
- basic sodium phosphate dihydrate
- Other
- sucrose
Other sources claim that Covid masks, tests, and vaccines also contain these controversial ingredients:
Grapheneoxide nanoparticles (in the masks and in the vaccines) to facilitate delivery, yet it causes DNA damage, oxidative stress, inflammation and tumors
Nano-Silver, as an anti-microbial (in the masks), yet it kills fish and nerve cells in humans
Ethylene oxide, for sterilization (in the tests), yet it is a narcotic and causes cancer
See: Wikipedia.org (Graphene oxide and Ethylene oxide), BUND and Sourcewatch.org (Nano-Silver)
worldrevolution21.com 